WAR on the MSM
| 
Taking on the New York Times
Have you forgotten the song by the Who, "Won't Get Fooled Again?"
Well, we are about to get fooled again. So let's get up and damn well do something about it.
WE the PEOPLE are so damned sick of the MSM that we believe now, in 2012, the time for ACTION is upon us.
We are telling candidates and radio talk-show hosts, to stop complaining about media bias. We are in the fight of our lives, people!
America, wake up! We have no RIGHT to unbiased media coverage. If that is gone, then, we have lost something. Does that mean we cannot ever have it again?
Not in the United States of America does it mean that!
WE HAVE TO FIGHT FOR IT. So, help us do that. Help us put a competitor on the streets of New York City that will gore the New York Times to death.
COMPETITION is our GREATEST WEAPON! Let's draw that sword and attack the marketplace of ideas.
We challenge any venture capitalist to get on board with us, and help us put the New York Times out of business. They are the most arch example of the media bias that led Barack Obama to the highest office on earth. They are the enemy of truth, have shown a tremendously anti-faith and anti-Constitutional trend in their reportage.
And, their advertisers have fled them, as has Wall Street confidence in their stock. Trading at $25 per share in 2007, investors left this shell of greatness in droves at a time when the Times was leading a political charge to elect Barack Hussein Obama. They succeeded in the political arena, but are paying a price now, with their stock under $10. You have to wonder how Publisher Arthur Sulzberger keeps his job...but at the New York Times, the mission isn't commerce; it's politics.
Therefore, they are failing in their commercial venture, and then vulnerable.
This is proof positive that in the marketplace of ideas, objectivity is rewarded, and bias is punished. Why do we sit by and allow the New York Times to whittle out an existence? A competitive New York City product would tumble the New York Times right out of business. There wouldn't be one advertising sales representative left even to answer a phone.
We predict the very announcement of a competitor might be enough to start the bleeding of the New York Times.
ARE YOU READY TO HELP US?
Now is the time to launch a competitor to the New York Times. Launch it now, and the New York Times would close its doors by October.
Investors out there, contact Hear Us Now USA, and let's talk. We think $10 million dollars will do it. This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Also, Hear Us Now USA makes a flat-out offer of $$$ for any reporter with proof of "Message Engineering" and outright bias from 2007 to the present. The evidence must be unimpeachable. Your identity will be kept completely secret.
Why does Hear Us Now USA call for an all-out attack on the Main Stream Media?
The answer is this.
Since 2007, our lives have been dominated by a handful of people in the United States: a handful in the Main Stream Media, and a handful in our National Government. In the MSM space there are an estimated 69,000 (click here to go to the source information), and 1.8 million civilians in the Federal gov't. (click here for more information).
Those workers together are POINT SIX PERCENT of our nation. Of that number, POINT ZERO TWO PERCENT are journalists, the Gatekeepers of the message.
And that POINT ZERO TWO PERCENT has sure been busy, haven't they? From 2007, 60% of news stories about Democrats were positive, 11 % negative; 26% of news stories about Republicans were positive, and 40% were negative! (click here for source information.)
This chart (left) puts those numbers into some perspective. News media generally covered Democrats favorably at a rate of 6 to one; these same outlets covered Republicans negatively just about 2 to one.
So, can we reduce these facts into reality? What this means is that in a reasonably divided country, juicing up the news 6 to 1 for one side, and hammering the other side 2 to 1, will yield a popular vote differential of 9.5 million popular votes.
The context was a sitting Big-Government Republican, directed by a misguided messenger in Karl Rove. The Bush Presidency was so close as to be decided at the Supreme Court in 2001.
And, then there were the many Barack Hussein Obama negatives to overcome. His cocaine use...his affiliation with anti-American racist Black pastor Reverend Wright. Tony Rezko, now a convicted felon, was a 
friend, who holds the mortgage on the Obama house. Disgraced Illinois Governor Blagoyevitch was an Obama close associate, and Obama worked for his reelection campaign. Bill Ayers, purported mastermind of the Nyack Massacre Brinks job in 1981, was an Annenburg Foundation board associate, neighborhood friend, in whose home Obama launched his career (click here to go to TruTV's chronicle of events). There was, too, the shady Arab bagman Rashid Khalidi, a PLO henchman and purported benefactor of Barack Hussein Obama.
Even against stumbling, Republican turncoat and wildly Liberal John McCain, who ran perhaps the worst campaign ever, Obama's background was shady enough to need a lot of help. And, he got it.
But the most staggering fact of all is that while BHO got nearly 70 million votes, that isn't half as many as DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM! One hundred and sixty million eligible voters either didn't vote for Obama, or didn't vote at all.
That's no mandate, and
that is why Americans are up and fighting mad.
Now, the MSM is pushing us all toward Mitt Romney, and away from the Conservative Candidates. The MSM so shunned Michele Bachmann that she couldn't get press. Here, a woman, with a chance to become President, couldn't get the backing of so-called feminist advocates in the Liberal Media.
This is why we must attack now.
Contact us. Help us.
2008 Presidential Election Results
Candidate (Party Label) Popular Vote Total Percent of Popular Vote (Federal Election Commission, click here)
CANDIDATE PARTY POP. VOTE % of POP. VOTE
Barack Obama (Democrat) 69,498,516 52.93%
John McCain (Republican) 59,948,323 45.65%
(P.S. 100 million didn't even vote.....above turnout was 58% of 255 million eligible.)